Team A working on an exercise during the last
Advanced Professional Certificate course
Let us assume that you have been appointed by a client and that you have made progress in understanding them, their aims and objectives and their way of working. Then, you are informed that they have made an agreement with another firm who are expert in some aspect of the site or project that your client is not. The commercial logic of the arrangement is understood, but what may not yet have been examined is how the two organisations are going to work together.
As a competent Project Manager, you may immediately suggest that there is a project board, with members drawn from each of the partners, to act as a forum at client level. That would be a good start, but it does not mean that underlying differences of attitude have gone away, just that there is a place to discuss them.
An example of this would be risk. Some organisations are much more risk-averse than others, and allergic to certain sorts of risk, such as risk to reputation. Such an organisation may want to take extreme care in working with external stakeholders. Other organisations may be less consultative and more gung-ho.
So, which attitude is going to prevail in the project in question, and what policies are going to arise from that decision? Another example is the procurement route. The more risk-averse partner may want to avoid the routes that give more exposure (like Construction Management), and instead try to get the contractor to take on most of the risk by used Design and Build. They may favour this even if they realise that a sacrifice in quality may be involved.
Commercial logic may lead to project management situations that are hard to resolve. If the risks are appreciated in good time, then there are various options. The project organisation can be given autonomy so that it can itself be a vehicle for change; or, the job can be re-configured as a programme so as to avoid some of the clashes. All of this depends on the Project manager being wise, experienced, and acting in a timely way.
Most project teams in the construction industry are thrown together. In some cases, of course, this is not the case: they are teams which have worked together successfully before, but this is far from being the rule.
What do you set out to achieve at the first project meeting? I’m sure you have a list which includes such things as a programme or timetable, setting up a sequence of meetings, establishing communication lines, the procedure for issuing instructions, and that sort of thing.
Lots of clients are very keen to see progress on site as soon as possible. This is understandable impatience; something done means that there is that much less still to do. An item on the list has been ticked off.
We all do it. We do things our own way, hoping to replicate the successes of the past and avoid its problems and failures. We are earnest in this, but are we systematic?
Website and contents © Johnston & Mather
We use cookies to improve our website and your experience when using it. Cookies used for the essential operation of the site have already been set. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our Privacy Policy. | |
I accept cookies from this site ACCEPT |